Well after seeing and try trying to help so many new bb users . with there purchases of the bbm addon.
I understand gg want them to buy the addon with a goody bag and not on its own ..fair point ..
but surely when people already have a live goody bag they should be able to add the addon ??
without having to wait until its expired ???
affecting new and existing members
those who buy goody bag and then realise they need to buy addon at the same time
and existing members who are already into a goody bag
allowing my idea saving a load of problems ..
that is putting members off and could easily be resolved
and more likely to keep members on giffgaff
and at lttle cost to giffgaff
Surely they must have considered this possible issue and coded this in to the bb system so there must be a way of solving it , Even if they have to take a hit to solve .
For every 1 person who is thwarted in their attempt to add BB after goodybag purchase, they will be so hacked off with GiffGaff that even if they each only go on to tell 10 people about their BAD GiffGaff experience, the number of potential customers lost is massive.
I think every customer counts.
if you think this is a viable idea please hit the yellows arrow on top left support
Wouldn't it be better if giffgaff gave payback quicker and earlier. I was thinking something like every month because 6months is a lot of wait to be rewarded. Anyone agree?
Kudos if you like the idea
Vincent indicated that the idea of handling multiple SIMs from a single
master account is currently unsuitable for giffgaff unfortunately.
One aspect of the proposal was to handle credit in a flexible manner,
i.e. to have the possibility to transfer credit from one SIM to
another. Vincent indicated that this in prinicple would be possible.
There was some discussion about implementing some form of credit
transfere on giffgaff before (see this tag) - so there is clearly interest in this,
not only from the side of companies and families but other users of giffgaff.
My partner works for the police. He told me that phone companies charge for them to ping (locate) phones at various levels. As a result often phones as located within a 5 mile radius whereas if there was no charge then they could locate someone exactly where they are and potentially save lives!
It seems a very sad state of affairs that someone may be at risk or danger and a phone company is charging the police to find them and therefore limiting how they do this best. Surely the law should override this but it doesn't. It seems that money takes precedence over the safety of the public whether they be at risk themselves or a criminal is potentially putting them at risk.
I think it would be great for Giffgaff to be a forerunner in saying to the police yes we can help and we won't charge you, it would give the company even greater kudos than I think it already has.
Let me know your thoughts!
Giffgaff should support the new upcoming O2 BoostBox for thoes users in a poor signal area.
If you don't already know, this little box plugs into your home fixed broadband and provides a mini mobile phone mast for your mobile (only pre-registered mobiles work on it).
I know this idea was suggested and rejected back in 2010 in this post:
But the company line back then was that it wasn't going to happen. Now that O2 are about to launch a femtocell product, it would be good if Giffgaff reconcidered it! Vodafone already have sure signal. If Giffgaff had a similar product, it would keep its competitive edge.
If you think this is a good idea, give it kudos!
Hi everyone, if your a regular poster here you will know about one our of every 15 questions (rough guess) is "setup Tethering" or "I'v been banned" or some other question relating to tethering using goodybags.
While we all know this isnt allowed unless your on a gigabag giffgaff is already starting to get some bad press about being banned with unlimited isnt unlimited simply because they haven't read the terms and conditions or the goodybag information etc.
So my solution.
Internet via giffgaff goes through a APN (Access Point Name) = giffgaff.com
So if we can get giffgaff to create a second APN maybe something like = tethering
We can charge access via this new APN at standard rates regardless if the user has a goodybag or not,
allowing for tethering use while having a active goodybag hence not limiting the customer to one service at a time or forcing them to use another device.
I think this should definately be technically possible and should solve the 'Not allowed" constantly being conveyed to goodybag customers.
Kudos the Idea if you like it and giffgaff may look at it
So after waiting 30 minutes and 1 second they are off to the forum, fb page, twitter and asking an agent as to why the sim isn't activated, quoting it says "30 minutes on the page "
At this point if I see them I try to link them to this kb article
Which makes it clear that 30 minutes isn't an absolute time. Having this link would be sensible I feel.
Further to having that link available I would like to see a visible activation bar / widget ( suggested from the members in the listening thread) so that they can see where they are in relation to full activation. With at the end it bursting into a beautiful pink message saying
0798547363 is your number welcome to giffgaff ( well you know what I mean maybe not quite so exuberant )
This should reduce the burden on the agents and the complaints I see on the fb page on twitter and on forum.
Possibly also allow a link to a direct agent question ( no messing with subsections ) once 24 is up to have a activation checked.
As usual I have no idea how technically feasible the idea is but hopefully its not impossible and wouldn't be costly to instigate.
We've been notified by gg in this thread by @jenniferho that, in an effort to save cost due to SIM wastage (SIMs ordered but not activated), that members will suffer reductions in the limits that they can order from their Spread giffgaff page.
I believe that a huge amount of cost could also be saved if gg stopped sending out the "Cheeky SIMs" too.
These, afterall, are nothing more than speculative as there is no guarantee of that being activated either?
As well as causing confusion to some new members who post on the forums wondering why they received it and what it was...
There are previous ideas of similar suggestion that were sent to the Idea Vault here and here due to lack of support and being against what the gg roadmap and ethos were trying to do, but, in light of the change of heart and direction by giffgaff, I feel this suggestion deserves its place on the boards again.
Thankyou for reading
There are many scenarios when one has a wifi connection but no O2 signal, for example:
- In Tube stations
- At home when a local mast goes down (a scenario I'm currently in)
- In an underground bar or restaurant
- Outside the UK (which would otherwise cost up to £1/min to receive)
- Indoor coverage blackspots
We all miss incoming calls in these scenarios. I am therefore suggesting that giffgaff implements SIP addresses and logins whereby giffgaff members can log in to their giffgaff line for incoming calls using any SIP app via a wifi connection. This means that whenever one does not have a mobile signal, one can still receive calls via wifi using an app on one's smartphone.
Other advantages are:
- This idea is similar to O2's TU Go, the main difference being that it avoids the need for giffgaff to build and maintain an app and all the infrastructure behind it.
- There are plenty of free and paid SIP apps in app stores, so giffgaff users would be free to choose the app they like the most. Some SIP apps even support push notifications so the app doesn't even have to be left open.
- The functionality to deliver a voice call from a mobile number to a SIP address would be simple and cheap for giffgaff to implement and operate. This is evident from the many telephone-number-to-SIP forwarding services that are provided free of charge by providers such as Flextel.
- Giffgaff receives the usual call termination revenue for the incoming call but because the call is subsequently delivered via the internet, giffgaff doesn't have to use this revenue to pay O2 or anyone else for delivering the call via a mobile network. Therefore giffgaff could even reward members for receiving calls via SIP, similarly to how it already incentivises the receiving of calls on the Hokey Cokey goodybag.
I got this idea from Russia. I use local prepaid SIM cards whenever I travel and MegaFon, my Russian prepaid SIM card provider, gives me exactly this functionality, i.e. a SIP address and login for my mobile number. MegaFon customers can choose whether incoming calls are delivered via the mobile network, via SIP or via both simultaneously. MegaFon goes two steps further than what I'm advocating for giffgaff, allowing outgoing calls via SIP and also providing an optional free app, a white label of Acrobits, a leading paid SIP app. It is bizarre that when I'm on the Tube or elsewhere without a mobile signal and with wifi, I can receive calls on my Russian mobile number but not on my UK mobile number via giffgaff. The Russians can do this; why doesn't giffgaff do the same?
My first idea suggestion, as a result of a recommendation. It's a silly idea, but simple nonetheless - use the word "GiffGaff" to replace profanity ( The original post ).
"Oh GiffGaff! You GiffGaffing Giff, you totally Gaffed up my car the other day when you Giffing Giffed the side of it with your GiffGaffing piece of Gaff car."
I think you get the picture I don't know how the current system works, whether you have different words for each specific swear word, or whether you have one blanket replacement for all words.
Either way, take it as it is - a fun suggestion that I don't think carries much weight but might make certain posts a bit fun to read (asuming, that is, that some members like to swear a lot in this forum - which I'm sure they don't because everyone here is oh-so-nice).
For some time now I've been thinking that networks should be able to give you the option to pick how many minutes, texts and how much Internet usage you want and then they give you the price.
If giffgaff were to put this idea into motion, I think it would really take off. Giving the customers what they really want is always a plus. Although I'm not saying the Goodybags they're offering now aren't great enough already, but I think it's something that should be looked into.
Who's with me?
Giffgaff said: '' From the 6-th of Nov 2012 The Channel Islands and Isle of Man (currently in bundle) will be charged at standard EU rates and, this will be displayed clearly on the pricing pages once implemented ''
Giffgaff never consulted with us to take such a decision .It is not fair play for hundreds of giffgaffers having relatives there (mother,father,brother,sister,uncle,aunt,friends).
My UK giffgaff number starts with +447934XXXXXX
My Sister Jersey Mobile nr.starts with +447937XXXXXX
1-st example :
07930 T-Mobile UK ,07931 T-MobileUK , 07932 T-Mobile UK , 07933 O2 UK , 07934 O2 UK , 07935 O2 UK , 07936 O2UK , 07937 Jersey Telecom, 07938 O2 UK , 07939 T-Mobile UK....
The 2-nd example:
07920 Vodafone UK , 07921 O2 UK , 07922 O2 UK , 07923 O2 , 07924X Manx Telecom,
07925 O2 UK, 07926 O2 UK, 07927 O2 UK, 07928 O2 UK, 07929 Orange UK
Who can realise the difference ? - Nobody .
PLEASE GIFFGAFF DO NOT CHARGE FOR CHANNEL ISLANDS ....O2 and Virgin Mobile also do not charge and it is included in bundle allowance no matter if pay and go or sim only pay monthly.There is also no difference with the numbers...Could it be actually a POLITICAL ISSUE..?.(my own opinion)
If giffgaff implements this there are a lot of people (almost 1000 )going to another network after receiving their payback in december ...especially O2 truly unlimited minutes/text and 1GB Internet sim costing only 20 Pounds in Month..or Virgin Mobile with Premiere SIM Only £20 (30 days rolling contract not 2 years!so after 30 days you can stay or go anytime you want ) This offer has :Unlimited minutes to UK landlines, 2500 minutes(UK+IOM+CI),Unlimited texts(UK+IOM+CI),Unlimited INTERNET
Thanks...for supporting this issue
i was thinking instead of one charity benefiting from the giffgaff donation ,
maybe all the chosen charites that giffgaff give us to pick from should get a slice of the giffgaff love .
Say after the members vote . and the shortlisted 3 charities are chosen
we split the donation between them on the percentage of there member votes cast
ie 50 % votes gets 50% funds .
This way all the members are happy
All the charities are happy
Giffgaff spreads the love further
More happy people and a fairer unified member selection .
yes i agree HALE ..though might have to be next year
kudos to oldyorkie and Mary_t_ for there imput
I think non paying gg members and who are only forum members should be restricted in the amount of soloutions or kudos they can give ..
this could be a set amount per month or week.
this would stop the blatent gaming as one person could set up multiple accounts and give their own accounts kudos and correct solutions, earning themselves payback, as well as helping out friends.
This would also save giffgaff time removing soloutions
this would cost nothing to implament and could save plenty in payback
and more importantly help with the frustration that genuine helpers feel with the gamers.
kudoos and thanks to pinkcalculator and borobabe for there imput and help- compiling this idea
Although bb addon is available to users with a goodybag purchase,
i think it should also available to those who only want to buy airtime ie not buy a goody bag .
Not everyone wants a goodybag and bbm as the prefer to manage there mins and data use
Could be like the goodybag option ie with £5 /£10 airtime topup
As a bye product of allowing this idea it would also solve the deemed impossible goodybag live addon issue.
allowing blackberry users to at least be able to get bbm addon before there goodybag expired
re duplicators but if this duplicates this idea i will remove link to old post
I have searched and cant see any other ideas
if you think this a good idea please support on yellow arrow top left
I may not be speaking for members as a community here, but I have just seen a not so pleasant username including swearing.
Would it not be wise to include the swear box into username creation? If the word was posted it would be blocked, so why not with usernames, after all it is more obvious! I'm not against swearing, but to use it inappropriately in a username with no meaning completely out of context is not needed for our community.
Of course members should have freedom in creativity, but I think more obvious swear words should be filtered out.
Kudo's if you agree, I'd say it's pretty urgent, to prevent it from happening again.