Merged Ideas of the Week 12/03

[#1]

Hey folks, welcome to the new edition of our Merged Ideas from this week. These are Ideas that need highlighting in light of a limitation from the platform to allow to bump them. 

Please support any you like that you haven't already - there's some great diamonds here. All these links open in a new window, so free feel to go crazy. 

• Get your voicemails sent to your email address. (22)
• The ability to make calls and texts over Wifi. (206)
• Being able to delete you goodybag, and/or start a new one early. (269)
• Call Catcher - for when you miss a call because you're out of service. (230)
• Being able to transfer credti to another account to top it up. (162)
• It's be nice to receive our payback quicker. (166)

Special thanks to all members who help keep the Board clean including but not limited to,@bertiebat , @xollobru , @shortylumber , @as7861 , @bethanaaay , @wbbuttercup and @blackfive460 (who also co-created this thread)

[#2]

Thanks Hazel , another great round up . 

[#3]

Nice one for this information

[#4]

Some ideas there well worth more support.

Thanks for keeping this going Hazel!

[#5]

Good idea for those of us with less time to browse around. Thanks.

[#6]

Just wondering about the mechanics of this one.

I've just added a kudos to the voicemail by email, which makes 6 added to a 'Not for us' idea.

Is there a mechanism or trigger in place to push these ideas back to the ideas meeting?

PS. Good work in pulling this thread together, would like to see a tangible result for one of the ideas that gets featured 

[#7]

I think it's great Hazel for those who can make use of such wonderful ideas , If I was young and into all this cyber malarky , I would be up for using most of what you have , 

[#8]

One downside of this approach though, is where I've supported a good idea and given then given the obligatory kudos.

And then a less practical variant of the original is proposed and I comment why the idea won't work or isn't a desirable development.

But once the threads have been merged it gives the impression that the less favourable comments relate to the OP rather than the weaker later idea. Which all looks a bit confusing to read one comment supporting an idea followed by another appearing not to support it!

[#9]

Thanks for the round-up Hazel. I've seen a few ideas here which I like and given them my support!

[#10]

@suppers_ready, thanks for your comment, seems that your question is about how we're handling 'Not for Us' ideas that gain new support? As all the other ideas on this thread that aren't 'Not for Us' will be in the system and work through as normal. I'll have to talk to Timo about that one and get back to you but good shout.

@andreww - Thanks for the comment, I've got a few thoughts on it but could you give me a recent example for me to have a look?

Kind regards,
Hazel.