Knowledge Base

Merged Ideas of the Week 12/03

Started by: hazel22
On: 12/03/2014 | 15:31
Replies: 41

by: hazel22
former giff-staffer

on: 12/03/2014 | 15:31 edited: 12/03/2014 | 15:32

Hey folks, welcome to the new edition of our Merged Ideas from this week. These are Ideas that need highlighting in light of a limitation from the platform to allow to bump them. 


Please support any you like that you haven't already - there's some great diamonds here. All these links open in a new window, so free feel to go crazy. 

Special thanks to all members who help keep the Board clean including but not limited to,@bertiebat , @xollobru , @shortylumber , @as7861 , @bethanaaay , @wbbuttercup and @blackfive460 (who also co-created this thread)

4th April 2011 - 5th June 2015
Message 1 of 42
by: brulaw
on: 12/03/2014 | 16:40

Thanks Hazel , another great round up . 

Message 2 of 42
by: zack1975
on: 12/03/2014 | 16:44
Nice one for this information
Message 3 of 42
by: blackfive460
on: 12/03/2014 | 18:03

Some ideas there well worth more support.

Thanks for keeping this going Hazel!

Message 4 of 42
by: nois
on: 12/03/2014 | 18:57

Good idea for those of us with less time to browse around. Thanks.

Message 5 of 42
by: suppers_ready
on: 12/03/2014 | 19:04

Just wondering about the mechanics of this one.


I've just added a kudos to the voicemail by email, which makes 6 added to a 'Not for us' idea.


Is there a mechanism or trigger in place to push these ideas back to the ideas meeting?



PS. Good work in pulling this thread together, would like to see a tangible result for one of the ideas that gets featured Smiley Happy

Message 6 of 42
by: silemairin
on: 12/03/2014 | 19:12

I think it's great Hazel for those who can make use of such wonderful ideas , If I was young and into all this cyber malarky , I would be up for using most of what you have , 

Message 7 of 42
by: andreww
on: 12/03/2014 | 20:51
One downside of this approach though, is where I've supported a good idea and given then given the obligatory kudos.

And then a less practical variant of the original is proposed and I comment why the idea won't work or isn't a desirable development.

But once the threads have been merged it gives the impression that the less favourable comments relate to the OP rather than the weaker later idea. Which all looks a bit confusing to read one comment supporting an idea followed by another appearing not to support it! Smiley Frustrated
Probably having a beer in the sunshine somewhere.
Message 8 of 42
by: ma2013
on: 13/03/2014 | 08:44

Thanks for the round-up Hazel. I've seen a few ideas here which I like and given them my support! Smiley Happy


If I've been helpful, feel free to award Kudos / Mark As Accepted Solution to posts. Get a free giffgaff Sim
Message 9 of 42
by: hazel22
former giff-staffer

on: 13/03/2014 | 08:54 edited: 13/03/2014 | 08:57

@suppers_ready, thanks for your comment, seems that your question is about how we're handling 'Not for Us' ideas that gain new support? As all the other ideas on this thread that aren't 'Not for Us' will be in the system and work through as normal. I'll have to talk to Timo about that one and get back to you but good shout.

@andreww - Thanks for the comment, I've got a few thoughts on it but could you give me a recent example for me to have a look?

Kind regards,

4th April 2011 - 5th June 2015
Message 10 of 42