Re: Is giffgaff's reactive moderation policy damaging to the community?

Sorry, it's not my intention to drag it off topic, just to explain why I think we should be holding off further changes until after the platform move and we see what we as users have at our disposal to manage interactions.

Message 21 of 28

by: extreme_one
on: 03/10/2018 | 19:19

Proactivity, on the part of the moderators, isn't software-dependent.

It's policy which is the problem, not the platform.

If this can be taken 2 ways, and 1 offends, I probably meant the other way.

Message 22 of 28

by: k89bpa
on: 03/10/2018 | 19:26

Agreed on the first part, but user behaviour can change dependent on the platform and the tools which are given to them.

Message 23 of 28

by: holier_than_thou
on: 03/10/2018 | 20:23

I've only had positive experiences with the moderation team so far, especially after being attacked for no apparent reason by some pillock.

My only bugbear is said pillock is still allowed to post. I'd have banned him quick smart for what he did.

Message 24 of 28

by: tradertall
on: 04/10/2018 | 13:33

It's one of the reasons I don't read many threads, even when I'm the OP.

Message 25 of 28

by: giffgaff20147
on: 05/10/2018 | 16:27

@extreme_one

Well they certainly are active as I found out this week ,

nothing bad just positive ,

i notice we have one from giffgaff who is on threads on help as well that’s new to my time on here

Can’t be bad to know someone is monitoring the threads

Message 26 of 28

by: robertmason1964
on: 06/10/2018 | 17:07

Exactly 😁

Message 27 of 28

Highlighted

by: ventriloquistsdoll
on: 10/10/2018 | 17:23

I think if ya beave ya self it won`t affect you

Message 28 of 28